The General Inspectorate of Justice is to stop the 3-4-5 days in May 2011, and came to work slowdowns and stoppages, the claim is for salary increases
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
How Did Women Have Such Small Waists In The 50's
Stop re-registration IGJ
The General Inspectorate of Justice is to stop the 3-4-5 days in May 2011, and came to work slowdowns and stoppages, the claim is for salary increases
The General Inspectorate of Justice is to stop the 3-4-5 days in May 2011, and came to work slowdowns and stoppages, the claim is for salary increases
Monday, April 25, 2011
Movie For Low Loss Header
Costs VI: Liq. order by No Middle
In a previous post, Costes V: Liq. No order for explain how to alter the clearance of product movements. We saw that this change in the settlement also altered the cost of disposal made (in fact, that was the purpose of the example we did). The example that illustrate the post was a valued product to the inventory valuation method FIFO. We saw that the last recorded output was not taking the cost of entry that would have played according to the FIFO, but took the cost of entry that interests us. The method assigns an output FIFO the cost of a ticket, just as does the LIFO, Standard or Special. Using the appropriate field, we did that instead of taking the cost of your ticket that you played, the other input cogiera different, but still, little changed from the concept that these methods of stock valuation.
But with the Middle ... What about the Middle? What would happen if we were making the same examples with a product value in the medium? Alter the clearance. Okay, fine. But in theory should not affect costs, since in the inventory valuation method average, the cost that is given out is not a specific cost of entries. It rather gives the average cost existing at the date of departure, as explained in the first post in the series of costs: costs I: Inventory Valuation Methods .
Let's see an example what effect does use the "Liq. By no order" in a product valued by the method of inventory valuation East.
The cost has been to the selected entry. Also, if you look at the new unit cost in the product details, we see that it has been updated so that the input has settled out in this way has not been taken into account in calculating the unit cost Product.
This behavior is appropriate for the course outlined in the previous post. We made an emergency purchase more expensive than usual. We knew that the subsequent sale of the stock took the emergency purchase, so we wanted to reflect this situation for the benefit in that sale was correct.
And in this case, it is, the sale takes the cost of this last entry, so that the benefit will be correct, and in addition, the purchase of urgency we have not altered the average cost of the product. Perfect. Cristina
Nicolàs
Dynamica 
In a previous post, Costes V: Liq. No order for explain how to alter the clearance of product movements. We saw that this change in the settlement also altered the cost of disposal made (in fact, that was the purpose of the example we did). The example that illustrate the post was a valued product to the inventory valuation method FIFO. We saw that the last recorded output was not taking the cost of entry that would have played according to the FIFO, but took the cost of entry that interests us.
But with the Middle ... What about the Middle? What would happen if we were making the same examples with a product value in the medium? Alter the clearance. Okay, fine. But in theory should not affect costs, since in the inventory valuation method average, the cost that is given out is not a specific cost of entries. It rather gives the average cost existing at the date of departure, as explained in the first post in the series of costs: costs I: Inventory Valuation Methods .
Let's see an example what effect does use the "Liq. By no order" in a product valued by the method of inventory valuation East.
How do you see in the picture, there have been 3 innings, one with a unit cost of 10, the second with a unit cost of 10 5 and the latter with a unit cost of 11. The current average cost, as can be seen in the product data sheet is 10.42.
Then, an exit wound from the last of the purchases, what cost will it take? Does the current average cost of the product? Or the cost of the selected input?
Let's try and see:
The cost has been to the selected entry. Also, if you look at the new unit cost in the product details, we see that it has been updated so that the input has settled out in this way has not been taken into account in calculating the unit cost Product.
This behavior is appropriate for the course outlined in the previous post. We made an emergency purchase more expensive than usual. We knew that the subsequent sale of the stock took the emergency purchase, so we wanted to reflect this situation for the benefit in that sale was correct.
And in this case, it is, the sale takes the cost of this last entry, so that the benefit will be correct, and in addition, the purchase of urgency we have not altered the average cost of the product. Perfect. Cristina
Nicolàs
Dynamica
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Monday, April 4, 2011
How To Achieve The Dahvie Vanity Hairstyle
IGJ: We extended the deadline until July 29 he resumed his activities
By resolution 01/2011 IGJ the deadline was extended by resolution 05/2010 to 29/07/2011 for l appresentation of the affidavit of Corporations, Foreign, Civil Associations and Foundations. 
By resolution 01/2011 IGJ the deadline was extended by resolution 05/2010 to 29/07/2011 for l appresentation of the affidavit of Corporations, Foreign, Civil Associations and Foundations.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Red Curving Lines On Sony Projection Tv
product valued at Costes V: Liq. No order for 347 Model
Today's post is related to costs I: Methods of stock valuation and also Costs IV: Settlement of products.
"Liq. by number order? ehem ... sorry ... What's that?
The title I have chosen is not particularly definitive, but if you continue reading you will understand, I speak of a field named Navision.
In the first post in the series of costs, we exactly the same movements of products for different products, each using a method other than inventory valuation, covering all inventory valuation methods used in Microsoft Dynamics NAV.
explain how costs were calculated on the movement of product. Implicitly, the cost calculation is telling us how to settle the movements of products (of which entry takes the stock out movement). This last point is that you can see and verify the manner explained in the fourth post of the range of costs.
Following the examples, and even making their own examples and noting Outstanding Amount field on the movement of product after each record, we find that the settlement movement of product is performed as follows:
- FIFO: Settlement of movement following a
- FIFO LIFO Liquidation of movement following a LIFO
- Standard: Settlement of movement following a FIFO
- Middle Settlement movements following a FIFO
- Special: Clearance of movement following a FIFO within the Lot No Serial No selected output
You may wonder if there is any way to alter the clearance of goods movements (and thus the cost thereof). In some cases it might be useful.
Consider the following scenario: I have in stock a product that a customer needs. When I deliver to the client, I realize it has some flaws and can not be used. A new product purchase can take days to arrive, but the client needs it urgently. There is a possibility of getting the product the same day to purchase elsewhere, but its price is significantly higher.
The profit margin of this product is 20%. By purchasing a this other provider, we get a profit of only 5%, but we'll have a satisfied customer, so we decided to proceed in this manner.
In the time sales are recorded, are in stock 2 units of the product: the flawed (although he has not received a refund or is due to be checked or repaired) and the urgent, being the defective first came into stock.
imagine that the method of valuation of stocks of this product is FIFO. If we register the sale without the sale we will take the cost of the first unit, the defective, a lower cost.
within a time When we do a cost analysis, profit, etc.., All the reports tell us that our profit on that sale was 20%.
actually, but we know beyond any doubt that the sale was the second of the units of the product, so that the benefit was much lower.
Following the theoretical assumption, I turn to throw the same question: is possible to alter the clearance of goods movements (and thus the cost thereof)?
The answer is yes. Thank goodness. If I set all this supposed to mean you can not finish this post and would not have had much grace.
The "alteration" can be done at the same time of registration, and can also be done afterwards.
In today's post will explain what you can force a liquidation of certain movements of goods at the time of registration using a field called "Liq. By no order." Another day will explain how to do afterwards.
"Liq. By no order." The field name is not particularly descriptive, but if you look the help of Navision says
"This field is used if the amount on line journal should settle on a document already registered. If so, enter the number of product movement should be settled on the line every day. "
aid may not say much, but it's a start.
To begin, we say that this field can be found in documents sale and purchase of products in newspapers, on the day of manufacture, etc..
If a line in any of the sites we have said, we introduce a product number and then drop down the field, "Liq . by no order ", we display all movements into the product in stock (ie, those with outstanding amount). Among the entries shown, we must select the one to which we give out.
Let's see a practical example:
We have a product with an inventory valuation method FIFO.
This product we have made 2 entries of 10 and 5 units at a cost of 10 and 11 per unit respectively.
addition, we performed an output of 3 units.
The current status of the product is shown in the picture below
now proceed to make a new sale. Although the first of the entries still have quantities in stock (7 units), we want to take the stock sale of the second FIFO entries although it would behoove take stock of the former.
Well, we created a sales document, we introduce the product and the quantity to sell, and in the field, "Liq. By no order," select the second entries (in this example, movement No. 323).
now recorded the sales order, and when we analyze the movements in the product we see that we got what we wanted because, as shown in the image that follows :
1. The outstanding amount of the first entries is still 7
2. The outstanding amount of the second entries has changed, now 3
3. The unit cost of sales was recorded just 11-
Cristina Nicolàs
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Ward's Ap Biology Lab 8 12
DPPJ
After almost four weeks of unemployment, DPPJ returned to develop business as normal, everything is also delayed by many days of inactivity. 
After almost four weeks of unemployment, DPPJ returned to develop business as normal, everything is also delayed by many days of inactivity.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Compering High School Annual Day Function
The Model 347 is the annual statement of operations with third parties and must be submitted by March 31.
the BOE in November 30, 2010 ( http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/11/30/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-18367.pdf ) appeared EHA/3061/2010 issued the order, which amended the existing 347 model so far.
In the new model, you should see a new field at positions 130 to 133 type 2 records with the following contents:
'Exercise: We entered all four digits of the year in which had declared the operations that give rise to payment in cash for amounts exceeding € 6,000. "
Microsoft has released modifications to the creation of the model 347 for Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 SP1, to comply with new specifications.
This is the link to download the new object.
Edito to put also the link to download the item for the NAV 5 SP1: https: / / mbs.microsoft.com/customersource/downloads/taxupdates/msd_nav5declaration347updates2011spain.htm
Edito to put also the link to download the item for the NAV 5 SP1: https: / / mbs.microsoft.com/customersource/downloads/taxupdates/msd_nav5declaration347updates2011spain.htm
Cristina Nicolàs
Dynamica 
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
What Else Causes Cold Herpes
On July 6, 2010 appeared in the Official Gazette published a law to combat late payment in Spain.
( http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/07/06/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-10708.pdf )
( http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/07/06/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-10708.pdf )
This law amends the terms of payment gradually until 2013, according to the type of company. At this point, so good. To reflect this in Navision enough to have defined appropriate payment terms, to calculate the due date under the new law. No problem.
But ... The law also amends other aspects.
For example, Article 4 of the Act provides that the maturity date of invoices should be calculated based on the date of receipt of goods or services.
also states that may be grouped together in one bill several installments, provided that the period between deliveries does not exceed 15 days. In this case, the expiration date shall be calculated based on the date corresponding to half of the period being billed.
In Navision know that the expiration date of the bill is calculated based on the date of issuance (the bill).
To correctly calculate the bills are due So we simply define appropriate payment terms, assigning them to our customers and suppliers, and in each invoice, put the appropriate Document Issue Date.
sure, but what we want is that Navision us know by himself to the appropriate Document Issue Date based on the reporting dates for the invoices (if any), that control us dockets get together not longer than 15 days, etc.
This ... so far it does not.
But, and here is the news, Microsoft announced today that it will develop this functionality for Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Such functionality should be available early in the third quarter of 2011.
The announcement does not specify what it will function. I hope you detail later.
Cristina Nicolàs
www.dynamica.es 
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)